It's time for the U.S. Senate to ratify the new arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia (New START).
The treaty's benefits are clear and concrete (PDF). Each side would reduce its nuclear stockpile by about one-third. Each side would adhere to an effective, multi-faceted monitoring scheme -- including satellite reconnaissance, on-site inspections, and extensive information exchanges -- that would ensure compliance with the agreement. The treaty would also set the stage for enhanced U.S. and Russian cooperation on urgent issues such as curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions and securing nuclear weapons and bomb-making materials to keep them out of the hands of terrorists. And it would signal to the rest of the world that the United States and Russia -- which together account for over 90% of the world's more than 20,000 nuclear weapons -- are serious about their commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The treaty calls for existing nuclear weapons states to reduce and eventually eliminate their arsenals in exchange for other signatories agreeing not to develop nuclear weapons.
The fewer nuclear weapons there are, the safer we all will be. New START offers an important step in the right direction.
So why hasn't the Senate ratified the treaty yet? First, the administration needed to make the case for the treaty, with a particular focus on Republican skeptics whose votes were needed to reach the 67 vote total needed to ratify a treaty. But that case has been made. There have been 18 hearings, dozens of briefings, hundreds of questions answered at the request of individual Senators, not to mention hundreds and hundreds of pages of reports, analysis, and testimony. An impressive bipartisan group of experts, including national security advisors and secretaries of state and defense from the Reagan, Bush (father and son) and Clinton administrations, has endorsed the treaty. So have all of the nation's top military leaders, along with key retired leaders like seven former commanders of U.S. nuclear forces.
So what is the holdup? Laura Rozen of Politico got hold of a memo by a staffer from the Senate Republican Policy Committee that purports to supply the reasons why the Senate should delay any vote on the treaty. In fact, the memo acknowledges that two of the main objections raised by the treaty's critics have already been addressed.
The first issue is "nuclear modernization" -- the ability to build a new generation of nuclear delivery vehicles and to preserve the reliability of existing warheads in the context of an upgraded nuclear weapons complex. There are serious questions about whether spending in these areas is in fact needed at a time when U.S. and Rusian arsenals are being reduced. But whatever one may think about building a shiny new weapons complex at a time when a growing number of world leaders are calling for the elimination of nuclear weapons, the Republican memo notes that New START will "preserve the ability of the United States to modernize its nuclear forces." The real complaint is that the Obama administration is not doing so quickly enough, even though it is spending more on the nuclear weapons complex than even the George W. Bush administration did.
As Linton Brooks, the head of the nuclear weapons complex in the Bush administration, said in April, "I'd have killed for that budget and that much high-level attention" during the Bush years compared to the Obama years.
A second major issue raised by Republican skeptics has been whether New START constrains the United States from developing whatever kind of missile defense system it chooses to. It does not. The Republican memo notes that this "may be a true statement," but that the real question is how much money and effort the Obama administration is willing to devote to missile defense. As with nuclear modernization, this is an issue of administration policy that has no direct link to the New START treaty. The treaty allows any administration to pursue as extensive a missile defense system as it desires; it does not, and should not, dictate what shape that system should take, or how much should be spent on it. That is an ongoing policy issue.
Holding New START hostage to the policy preferences of some -- not all -- Republican skeptics makes no sense. New START is valuable in its own right, and it will make us all safer by reducing the number of nuclear weapons in both Russia and the United States. Debates over what kind of missile defense system to build, or how much to spend on modernizing nuclear delivery vehicles and the nuclear warhead complex, should be pursued on their own merits, outside the context of the treaty.
The Senate should ratify New START before the end of the year, during its lame duck session. There is no good reason to wait, and there are a number of very good reasons to move forward now.
Jesus H. Christ, someone who finally gets it. Look, bankers make money only one of two ways: lending & repossession. (Hyper) inflation to the extent of diluting creditor savings isn't in the play book. Repossession (deflation) has always been in the cards after the wild securitization (inflation).
Let's put this aside for a moment and consider sales. How do you get someone to agree with your decision? Why, you get them to first initiate an idea so that you are merely agreeing with them. Now, consider Trav's comment awhile back to the extent that a then expansionary Congress would warrant placing tanks in front of the Fed if they refused to lend (monetize). Ergo, the Fed would be 'forced' to print due to Congressional desire.
Well, consider what has just happened in the reverse: we had an election of truly historic proportions which placed new House members in power under a mandate of fiscal responsibility. So what does Ben do? He comes out the next day and says he's gonna print. And what is the predictable result? As I mentioned to TD that the next 2+ years will be all political - we now have a broad based media hissy fit calling for Ben's head.
Tar Baby: "Only please, Brer Fox, please don't throw me into the briar patch." LOL Ben will be forced to stand down, just as originally desired, because the next stage in our little saga is austerity aka deflationary collapse.
Oh, BTW, since TD did admit to limited interest in political intrigue, I would suggest that he & others read this note and then study up on the two links listed below:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44709.html
Veterans of the contentious battles of the Clinton administration warn that the Obama White House is entirely unprepared for the level of scrutiny it is about to experience. “They’ve already been complaining that they’re beleaguered by Congress,” said one veteran Democratic strategist. “I don’t think [White House aides] have the slightest idea what they’re facing.”
Contempt of Congress
"Contempt of Congress," in modern times a person must refuse to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommittee — usually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of documents — in order to be considered in "contempt of Congress."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress
Select or special committee (United States Congress)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Select_or_special_committee_%28United_State...
One last comment: Ben could be called in at 1pm on Jan 3rd and be in jail by 5pm. He knows this, Congress knows he knows this, so it won't even come close to that point. This is all theatre to distract the rubes. We voted for pain, and pain is what we're gonna get.
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
It's time for the U.S. Senate to ratify the new arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia (New START).
The treaty's benefits are clear and concrete (PDF). Each side would reduce its nuclear stockpile by about one-third. Each side would adhere to an effective, multi-faceted monitoring scheme -- including satellite reconnaissance, on-site inspections, and extensive information exchanges -- that would ensure compliance with the agreement. The treaty would also set the stage for enhanced U.S. and Russian cooperation on urgent issues such as curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions and securing nuclear weapons and bomb-making materials to keep them out of the hands of terrorists. And it would signal to the rest of the world that the United States and Russia -- which together account for over 90% of the world's more than 20,000 nuclear weapons -- are serious about their commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The treaty calls for existing nuclear weapons states to reduce and eventually eliminate their arsenals in exchange for other signatories agreeing not to develop nuclear weapons.
The fewer nuclear weapons there are, the safer we all will be. New START offers an important step in the right direction.
So why hasn't the Senate ratified the treaty yet? First, the administration needed to make the case for the treaty, with a particular focus on Republican skeptics whose votes were needed to reach the 67 vote total needed to ratify a treaty. But that case has been made. There have been 18 hearings, dozens of briefings, hundreds of questions answered at the request of individual Senators, not to mention hundreds and hundreds of pages of reports, analysis, and testimony. An impressive bipartisan group of experts, including national security advisors and secretaries of state and defense from the Reagan, Bush (father and son) and Clinton administrations, has endorsed the treaty. So have all of the nation's top military leaders, along with key retired leaders like seven former commanders of U.S. nuclear forces.
So what is the holdup? Laura Rozen of Politico got hold of a memo by a staffer from the Senate Republican Policy Committee that purports to supply the reasons why the Senate should delay any vote on the treaty. In fact, the memo acknowledges that two of the main objections raised by the treaty's critics have already been addressed.
The first issue is "nuclear modernization" -- the ability to build a new generation of nuclear delivery vehicles and to preserve the reliability of existing warheads in the context of an upgraded nuclear weapons complex. There are serious questions about whether spending in these areas is in fact needed at a time when U.S. and Rusian arsenals are being reduced. But whatever one may think about building a shiny new weapons complex at a time when a growing number of world leaders are calling for the elimination of nuclear weapons, the Republican memo notes that New START will "preserve the ability of the United States to modernize its nuclear forces." The real complaint is that the Obama administration is not doing so quickly enough, even though it is spending more on the nuclear weapons complex than even the George W. Bush administration did.
As Linton Brooks, the head of the nuclear weapons complex in the Bush administration, said in April, "I'd have killed for that budget and that much high-level attention" during the Bush years compared to the Obama years.
A second major issue raised by Republican skeptics has been whether New START constrains the United States from developing whatever kind of missile defense system it chooses to. It does not. The Republican memo notes that this "may be a true statement," but that the real question is how much money and effort the Obama administration is willing to devote to missile defense. As with nuclear modernization, this is an issue of administration policy that has no direct link to the New START treaty. The treaty allows any administration to pursue as extensive a missile defense system as it desires; it does not, and should not, dictate what shape that system should take, or how much should be spent on it. That is an ongoing policy issue.
Holding New START hostage to the policy preferences of some -- not all -- Republican skeptics makes no sense. New START is valuable in its own right, and it will make us all safer by reducing the number of nuclear weapons in both Russia and the United States. Debates over what kind of missile defense system to build, or how much to spend on modernizing nuclear delivery vehicles and the nuclear warhead complex, should be pursued on their own merits, outside the context of the treaty.
The Senate should ratify New START before the end of the year, during its lame duck session. There is no good reason to wait, and there are a number of very good reasons to move forward now.
Jesus H. Christ, someone who finally gets it. Look, bankers make money only one of two ways: lending & repossession. (Hyper) inflation to the extent of diluting creditor savings isn't in the play book. Repossession (deflation) has always been in the cards after the wild securitization (inflation).
Let's put this aside for a moment and consider sales. How do you get someone to agree with your decision? Why, you get them to first initiate an idea so that you are merely agreeing with them. Now, consider Trav's comment awhile back to the extent that a then expansionary Congress would warrant placing tanks in front of the Fed if they refused to lend (monetize). Ergo, the Fed would be 'forced' to print due to Congressional desire.
Well, consider what has just happened in the reverse: we had an election of truly historic proportions which placed new House members in power under a mandate of fiscal responsibility. So what does Ben do? He comes out the next day and says he's gonna print. And what is the predictable result? As I mentioned to TD that the next 2+ years will be all political - we now have a broad based media hissy fit calling for Ben's head.
Tar Baby: "Only please, Brer Fox, please don't throw me into the briar patch." LOL Ben will be forced to stand down, just as originally desired, because the next stage in our little saga is austerity aka deflationary collapse.
Oh, BTW, since TD did admit to limited interest in political intrigue, I would suggest that he & others read this note and then study up on the two links listed below:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44709.html
Veterans of the contentious battles of the Clinton administration warn that the Obama White House is entirely unprepared for the level of scrutiny it is about to experience. “They’ve already been complaining that they’re beleaguered by Congress,” said one veteran Democratic strategist. “I don’t think [White House aides] have the slightest idea what they’re facing.”
Contempt of Congress
"Contempt of Congress," in modern times a person must refuse to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommittee — usually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of documents — in order to be considered in "contempt of Congress."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress
Select or special committee (United States Congress)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Select_or_special_committee_%28United_State...
One last comment: Ben could be called in at 1pm on Jan 3rd and be in jail by 5pm. He knows this, Congress knows he knows this, so it won't even come close to that point. This is all theatre to distract the rubes. We voted for pain, and pain is what we're gonna get.
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
It's time for the U.S. Senate to ratify the new arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia (New START).
The treaty's benefits are clear and concrete (PDF). Each side would reduce its nuclear stockpile by about one-third. Each side would adhere to an effective, multi-faceted monitoring scheme -- including satellite reconnaissance, on-site inspections, and extensive information exchanges -- that would ensure compliance with the agreement. The treaty would also set the stage for enhanced U.S. and Russian cooperation on urgent issues such as curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions and securing nuclear weapons and bomb-making materials to keep them out of the hands of terrorists. And it would signal to the rest of the world that the United States and Russia -- which together account for over 90% of the world's more than 20,000 nuclear weapons -- are serious about their commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The treaty calls for existing nuclear weapons states to reduce and eventually eliminate their arsenals in exchange for other signatories agreeing not to develop nuclear weapons.
The fewer nuclear weapons there are, the safer we all will be. New START offers an important step in the right direction.
So why hasn't the Senate ratified the treaty yet? First, the administration needed to make the case for the treaty, with a particular focus on Republican skeptics whose votes were needed to reach the 67 vote total needed to ratify a treaty. But that case has been made. There have been 18 hearings, dozens of briefings, hundreds of questions answered at the request of individual Senators, not to mention hundreds and hundreds of pages of reports, analysis, and testimony. An impressive bipartisan group of experts, including national security advisors and secretaries of state and defense from the Reagan, Bush (father and son) and Clinton administrations, has endorsed the treaty. So have all of the nation's top military leaders, along with key retired leaders like seven former commanders of U.S. nuclear forces.
So what is the holdup? Laura Rozen of Politico got hold of a memo by a staffer from the Senate Republican Policy Committee that purports to supply the reasons why the Senate should delay any vote on the treaty. In fact, the memo acknowledges that two of the main objections raised by the treaty's critics have already been addressed.
The first issue is "nuclear modernization" -- the ability to build a new generation of nuclear delivery vehicles and to preserve the reliability of existing warheads in the context of an upgraded nuclear weapons complex. There are serious questions about whether spending in these areas is in fact needed at a time when U.S. and Rusian arsenals are being reduced. But whatever one may think about building a shiny new weapons complex at a time when a growing number of world leaders are calling for the elimination of nuclear weapons, the Republican memo notes that New START will "preserve the ability of the United States to modernize its nuclear forces." The real complaint is that the Obama administration is not doing so quickly enough, even though it is spending more on the nuclear weapons complex than even the George W. Bush administration did.
As Linton Brooks, the head of the nuclear weapons complex in the Bush administration, said in April, "I'd have killed for that budget and that much high-level attention" during the Bush years compared to the Obama years.
A second major issue raised by Republican skeptics has been whether New START constrains the United States from developing whatever kind of missile defense system it chooses to. It does not. The Republican memo notes that this "may be a true statement," but that the real question is how much money and effort the Obama administration is willing to devote to missile defense. As with nuclear modernization, this is an issue of administration policy that has no direct link to the New START treaty. The treaty allows any administration to pursue as extensive a missile defense system as it desires; it does not, and should not, dictate what shape that system should take, or how much should be spent on it. That is an ongoing policy issue.
Holding New START hostage to the policy preferences of some -- not all -- Republican skeptics makes no sense. New START is valuable in its own right, and it will make us all safer by reducing the number of nuclear weapons in both Russia and the United States. Debates over what kind of missile defense system to build, or how much to spend on modernizing nuclear delivery vehicles and the nuclear warhead complex, should be pursued on their own merits, outside the context of the treaty.
The Senate should ratify New START before the end of the year, during its lame duck session. There is no good reason to wait, and there are a number of very good reasons to move forward now.
Jesus H. Christ, someone who finally gets it. Look, bankers make money only one of two ways: lending & repossession. (Hyper) inflation to the extent of diluting creditor savings isn't in the play book. Repossession (deflation) has always been in the cards after the wild securitization (inflation).
Let's put this aside for a moment and consider sales. How do you get someone to agree with your decision? Why, you get them to first initiate an idea so that you are merely agreeing with them. Now, consider Trav's comment awhile back to the extent that a then expansionary Congress would warrant placing tanks in front of the Fed if they refused to lend (monetize). Ergo, the Fed would be 'forced' to print due to Congressional desire.
Well, consider what has just happened in the reverse: we had an election of truly historic proportions which placed new House members in power under a mandate of fiscal responsibility. So what does Ben do? He comes out the next day and says he's gonna print. And what is the predictable result? As I mentioned to TD that the next 2+ years will be all political - we now have a broad based media hissy fit calling for Ben's head.
Tar Baby: "Only please, Brer Fox, please don't throw me into the briar patch." LOL Ben will be forced to stand down, just as originally desired, because the next stage in our little saga is austerity aka deflationary collapse.
Oh, BTW, since TD did admit to limited interest in political intrigue, I would suggest that he & others read this note and then study up on the two links listed below:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44709.html
Veterans of the contentious battles of the Clinton administration warn that the Obama White House is entirely unprepared for the level of scrutiny it is about to experience. “They’ve already been complaining that they’re beleaguered by Congress,” said one veteran Democratic strategist. “I don’t think [White House aides] have the slightest idea what they’re facing.”
Contempt of Congress
"Contempt of Congress," in modern times a person must refuse to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommittee — usually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of documents — in order to be considered in "contempt of Congress."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress
Select or special committee (United States Congress)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Select_or_special_committee_%28United_State...
One last comment: Ben could be called in at 1pm on Jan 3rd and be in jail by 5pm. He knows this, Congress knows he knows this, so it won't even come close to that point. This is all theatre to distract the rubes. We voted for pain, and pain is what we're gonna get.
eric seiger
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
First Solar <b>News</b>, Rumors: CIGS, Mercury, Tellurium : Greentech Media
First the news... Apollo Solar Energy (OTC: ASOE), a vertically integrated miner, refiner and producer of high purity tellurium (Te), announced a five-year purchase contract between Apollo Solar Energy and a major worldwide solar panel ...
Pulse Brings You <b>News</b> and RSS in an Elegant Flow
Android/iOS: Blogs and news sites put all that effort into making their posts graphically appealing, so why not see what they've got? Pulse, a nicely different kind of news reader, pulls your news in through side-scrolling, ...
The Allmusic Blog » <b>News</b> Roundup: 11/10/2010
The blog site of allmusic.com. Music news, reviews of new songs, information about upcoming releases and tours, highlighting forgotten treasures, rediscoveries, and all manners of interesting music culled from the AMG archive.
eric seiger
No comments:
Post a Comment